Comments

Oscar Slater is Set Free .. — 5 Comments

  1. I am Thomas Toughill, the author of the Oscar Slater books.

    I am willing to discuss this case here.

    • Thank you for writing to us, Mr Toughill.

      It’s a splendid compliment to all of us at Scotiana – now five years old – that you should offer to share with our readers your unrivalled knowledge of the whole Slater affair.

      Very many people, I know, recognise the great moral courage, the patient and dogged determination and years of hard work that alone allowed you to complete the two books on Oscar Slater, a subject which even today remains controversial.

      Thank you again for your generous offer.

      With kind regards, Iain.

  2. May I add a word or two on the final days of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s campaign to get Oscar Slater out of jail?

    Public attention turned again to the Slater case after the Great War, and throughout the 1920’s the strength of public opinion in Slater’s favour had been increasing. It was in 1927 that the campaign to free Slater received the final impetus that was to lead to success.

    William Park’s book “The Truth About Oscar Slater” appeared that year, exposing the many weaknesses in the prosecution case. (A Glasgow journalist, Park had reported on the affair from the start; his health was now, sadly, failing.) But the decisive event was the intervention of Ramsay MacDonald, a Scot and a former Prime Minister.

    (James Ramsay MacDonald, 1866-1937, was no Establishment figure, nevertheless he was a man of considerable influence. Born in poor circumstances at Lossiemouth, Moray, MacDonald hated injustice and was therefore a natural ally of Conan Doyle in his campaign.)

    It has been said that there is no greater pleasure than to do good by stealth – and then, perhaps, to be discovered! Ramsay MacDonald may have known the truth of this; in any event, he resolved to write privately to the Scottish Secretary, Sir John Gilmour, after seeing a copy of Park’s book, forwarded to him by Conan Doyle. MacDonald confessed to being shocked by the course that events had taken in the Slater case, and expressed regret that he had not shown an interest in the affair earlier.

    “By late October,” writes David Marquand,(in his long and scholarly biography ‘Ramsay MacDonald’ – Jonathan Cape, 1977, etc.) “it seemed clear that the Scottish Office were prepared to release Slater, while still resisting any suggestion that the case should be reopened. .. Meanwhile, another piece of evidence had come to light. Helen Lambie, one of the chief prosecution witnesses at Slater’s trial, told a reporter that she had been bullied by the police into giving false evidence.”

    Ramsay MacDonald and Sir John Gilmour exchanged a number of letters, but it was MacDonald’s firmly-written letter of 24 October that precipitated Slater’s release. The former prime minister reminded Sir John just how easily it could be demonstrated that – in MacDonald’s own words – “the Scottish legal authorities and the Police strove for Slater’s conviction by influencing witnesses and withholding evidence.” He then went on to threaten Gilmour that, if Slater was not immediately set free, he would name the truly guilty men in the House of Commons (where the laws of libel do not apply).

    “On 10 November, Gilmour announced .. that Slater was to be released,” continues David Marquand.

    ‘Oscar Slater has now completed eighteen and a half years of his life sentence, and I have felt justified in deciding to authorise his release on licence as soon as suitable arrangements can be made.’

    Surprisingly, perhaps, this announcement seems to have been made not in a formal Statement – which the case surely deserved – but in reply to a parliamentary question. The less said, the better?

    There was not even the hint of an acknowledgment that a grave miscarriage of justice had occurred. On the contrary, the authorities seemed anxious to maintain the illusion that Slater was guilty as charged; that, even as they set him free, they were merely showing ‘mercy’ to a wicked man who was lucky to have escaped being hanged! This attitude, I think, explains most simply why the authorities kept their wretched prisoner at work, breaking stones, almost until the last moment of his captivity.

    Iain.

  3. I mention Ramsay MacDonald’s intervention on pages 189-192 of my revised book.
    The Ramsay MacDonald (RM) correspondence is in file HH 16/111 in the Scottish Record Office in Edinburgh. To be exact, the correspondence is kept in an envelope in a pouch on the rear cover of sub-file 20577/108.
    An important factor in RM’s decision to intervene was a document which John Trench took from the Glasgow Police files when he saw that he would be dismissed from the Force after the Secret Inquiry of 1914 declared against him. This document showed that he had been telling the truth, as he understood the truth.
    Trench did not get the chance to use this document. However, his widow sent the document to Conan Doyle who recognised its value and forwarded a copy of it to RM.
    RM was appalled by what Conan Doyle showed him and began his correspondence, ‘in a personal capacity’, with the Scottish Secretary. In a letter on 24th October 1927, RM stated, ‘The Scottish legal authorities and the police strove for Slater’s conviction by influencing witnesses and with-holding evidence.’
    Should anyone ever maintain that Slater was not framed, then just quote that sentence, written by a man who twice ran the British Empire!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>